Web Typography Standards Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/ram108-typo

Автоматическое применение правил типографики для WordPress. Оnly for the Russian language typography

200 active installs v0.6.4 PHP + WP 3.3.3+ Updated Feb 4, 2022
ram108typotypographtypographytypogrify
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is Web Typography Standards Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

Web Typography Standards has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 4yr ago
Risk Assessment

The ram108-typo v3.5 Gold Master plugin exhibits an exceptionally strong security posture based on the provided static analysis and vulnerability history. The complete absence of identified attack surface elements like AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, and cron events, particularly those lacking authentication, significantly reduces the potential for external exploitation. Furthermore, the code analysis reveals a commitment to secure coding practices, with no dangerous functions, file operations, or external HTTP requests detected. The exclusive use of prepared statements for all SQL queries and proper output escaping for all identified outputs are excellent indicators of robust data handling and protection against common vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. The lack of any recorded CVEs, past or present, further reinforces this positive assessment.

While the absence of identified taint flows and vulnerabilities is a significant strength, it's also important to acknowledge that static analysis is not exhaustive and cannot guarantee the complete absence of all potential issues. The lack of nonce and capability checks, while not a direct concern given the zero attack surface, indicates a potential gap in security mechanisms that would be critical if any entry points were ever introduced or discovered. The vulnerability history being entirely clear is a strong positive, suggesting a history of diligent security maintenance or a lack of historical targeting. Overall, the plugin demonstrates a highly secure development approach, making it appear very low risk at this time, though the theoretical absence of certain checks warrants a minor note.

Key Concerns

  • No nonce checks detected
  • No capability checks detected
Vulnerabilities
None known

Web Typography Standards Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Version History

Web Typography Standards Release Timeline

v0.6.4Current
v0.6.3
v0.6.2
v0.6.1
v0.5.4
v0.5.3
v0.5.2
v0.5.1
v0.5.0
v0.4.2
v0.4.1
v0.4.0
v0.3.1
v0.3
v0.2.2
v0.1
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 16, 2026

Web Typography Standards Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
0
1 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

100% escaped1 total outputs
Attack Surface

Web Typography Standards Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 1
actionwpplugin.php:89
Maintenance & Trust

Web Typography Standards Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested5.9.13
Last updatedFeb 4, 2022
PHP min version
Downloads10K

Community Trust

Rating96/100
Number of ratings5
Active installs200
Developer Profile

Web Typography Standards Developer Profile

ram108

3 plugins · 310 total installs

84
trust score
Avg Security Score
85/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect Web Typography Standards

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Web Typography Standards