google-syntax Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/google-syntax

This is a code prettify plugin. the code higlighting effect will be seen directly in the mce editor.

10 active installs v0.1 PHP + WP 2.0+ Updated Dec 13, 2013
codegoogleprettifysyntaxsyntaxhighlighter
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is google-syntax Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

google-syntax has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 12yr ago
Risk Assessment

The "google-syntax" v0.1 plugin exhibits a seemingly robust security posture based on the provided static analysis. The absence of any identified attack surface (AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, cron events) is a significant positive. Furthermore, the complete absence of dangerous functions, file operations, and external HTTP requests suggests a limited scope and minimal risk of common attack vectors. The fact that all identified SQL queries utilize prepared statements is also a strong indicator of good practice in database interaction.

However, a critical concern arises from the output escaping analysis. With 2 total outputs and 0% properly escaped, this indicates a high likelihood of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. Any user-supplied or dynamically generated data that is displayed on the frontend without proper sanitization or escaping is vulnerable to malicious script injection. The lack of any recorded vulnerabilities in its history is positive, but it should not overshadow the identified weaknesses in the current code. The absence of nonces and capability checks, while potentially acceptable given the zero attack surface, means that if the attack surface were to expand in future versions without corresponding security checks, it could lead to vulnerabilities.

In conclusion, while "google-syntax" v0.1 appears to have a clean slate regarding known vulnerabilities and common dangerous code patterns, the complete lack of output escaping presents a significant and actionable security risk. Developers should prioritize addressing this to prevent potential XSS attacks. The limited attack surface is a strength, but future development should maintain security best practices, especially regarding input validation and output sanitization, if new entry points are introduced.

Key Concerns

  • Unescaped output detected
Vulnerabilities
None known

google-syntax Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

google-syntax Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
2
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

0% escaped2 total outputs
Attack Surface

google-syntax Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 3
actionmedia_buttonsgoogle-syntax.php:30
actionwp_headgoogle-syntax.php:31
filtermce_cssgoogle-syntax.php:32
Maintenance & Trust

google-syntax Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested3.7.41
Last updatedDec 13, 2013
PHP min version
Downloads3K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

google-syntax Developer Profile

princehaku

1 plugin · 10 total installs

84
trust score
Avg Security Score
85/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect google-syntax

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

Asset Paths
/wp-content/plugins/google-syntax/google-code-prettify/prettify.css
Script Paths
/wp-content/plugins/google-syntax/google-code-prettify/prettify.js

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
prettyprint
Data Attributes
id="codetype"id="codetext"id="codeinsert"
JS Globals
prettyPrintOne
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about google-syntax