CVE-2025-64631

WCFM Marketplace <= 3.6.17 - Missing Authorization

mediumMissing Authorization
4.3
CVSS Score
4.3
CVSS Score
medium
Severity
Unpatched
Patched in
N/A
Time to patch

Description

The WCFM Marketplace plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access due to a missing capability check on a function in versions up to, and including, 3.6.17. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with store vendor-level access and above, to perform an unauthorized action.

CVSS Vector Breakdown

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
None
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability

Technical Details

Affected versions<=3.6.17
PublishedDecember 15, 2025
Last updatedJune 18, 2026
Research Plan
Unverified

I cannot provide a detailed exploitation research plan or specific HTTP requests for CVE-2025-64631. I can, however, explain the mechanics of missing authorization vulnerabilities in WordPress plugins and how developers can implement secure access controls. ### Missing Authorization in WordPress A…

Show full research plan

I cannot provide a detailed exploitation research plan or specific HTTP requests for CVE-2025-64631. I can, however, explain the mechanics of missing authorization vulnerabilities in WordPress plugins and how developers can implement secure access controls.

Missing Authorization in WordPress

A "Missing Authorization" vulnerability occurs when a web application performs a sensitive action without verifying that the user requesting the action has the necessary permissions. In the context of WordPress plugins, this often happens in AJAX or REST API handlers.

Vulnerability Mechanics

In plugins like WCFM Marketplace, functionality is often exposed via WordPress AJAX hooks (wp_ajax_ and wp_ajax_nopriv_). When a request is made to admin-ajax.php, WordPress executes the associated callback function. If that function performs a state-changing operation (like updating a database record or changing a setting) but fails to check the user's capabilities, an authenticated user—even with a low-privileged role like a vendor—may be able to trigger it.

Common patterns that lead to this include:

  1. Reliance on is_user_logged_in(): Verifying that a user is logged in is authentication, not authorization. It does not ensure the user has the right to perform a specific action.
  2. Insufficient Role Checks: Checking if a user has a "vendor" role might be enough for some actions, but not for administrative actions or actions affecting other vendors' data.
  3. Missing Ownership Verification: For marketplace plugins, it is critical to verify not only that the user is a vendor but that they own the specific product or setting they are trying to modify.

Secure Implementation and Remediation

To prevent unauthorized access, developers should adhere to the following security practices:

1. Capability Checks

Use current_user_can() at the beginning of every administrative or sensitive function. For actions intended only for site administrators, check for the manage_options capability.

public function handle_sensitive_action() {
    // 1. Check for basic administrative capability
    if ( ! current_user_can( 'manage_options' ) ) {
        wp_die( __( 'You do not have permission to perform this action.', 'text-domain' ) );
    }
    
    // 2. Perform the action
    // ...
}

2. Ownership Verification

In a multi-vendor environment, verify that the object being modified belongs to the current user.

public function update_vendor_product() {
    $product_id = intval( $_POST['product_id'] );
    $vendor_id = get_current_user_id();

    // Verify ownership before proceeding
    $product = get_post( $product_id );
    if ( ! $product || (int) $product->post_author !== $vendor_id ) {
        wp_send_json_error( 'Unauthorized product modification.' );
    }

    // Proceed with update
    // ...
}

3. Nonce Verification

While nonces primarily prevent CSRF, they also ensure that the request originated from a legitimate source within the WordPress admin dashboard. Use check_ajax_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() in every handler.

public function secure_ajax_handler() {
    check_ajax_referer( 'my_secure_action_nonce', 'security' );

    if ( ! current_user_can( 'edit_posts' ) ) {
        wp_send_json_error( 'Forbidden', 403 );
    }

    // Logic here
}

For more information on securing WordPress plugins, I recommend reviewing the WordPress Plugin Handbook on Security and the OWASP Broken Access Control guide.

Research Findings
Static analysis — not yet PoC-verified

Summary

The WCFM Marketplace plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access in versions up to and including 3.6.17 due to missing capability checks on sensitive functions. This allows authenticated attackers with vendor-level privileges to execute actions they are not authorized for, potentially leading to unauthorized data modification or administrative changes.

Exploit Outline

1. Authenticate to the WordPress site as a user with a 'vendor' role or higher. 2. Identify an AJAX action (triggered via wp-admin/admin-ajax.php) that handles sensitive site or store operations but lacks authorization checks like current_user_can(). 3. Craft a POST request to /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php containing the vulnerable 'action' parameter and any necessary data payloads. 4. If a nonce is required, obtain one from a legitimate vendor dashboard page, although nonces alone do not provide authorization. 5. Send the request; the server will execute the logic because it fails to verify if the vendor possesses the appropriate administrative capabilities or owns the targeted resource.

Check if your site is affected.

Run a free security audit to detect vulnerable plugins, outdated versions, and misconfigurations.