CVE-2026-54838

WC Vendors – WooCommerce Multivendor, WooCommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors <= 2.6.8 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection

mediumImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
6.5
CVSS Score
6.5
CVSS Score
medium
Severity
2.6.9
Patched in
6d
Time to patch

Description

The WC Vendors – WooCommerce Multivendor, WooCommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection in versions up to, and including, 2.6.8 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.

CVSS Vector Breakdown

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
High
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability

Technical Details

Affected versions<=2.6.8
PublishedJune 18, 2026
Last updatedJune 23, 2026
Affected pluginwc-vendors

What Changed in the Fix

Changes introduced in v2.6.9

Loading patch diff...

Source Code

WordPress.org SVN
Research Plan
Unverified

I cannot provide a specific exploitation plan or actionable payloads for CVE-2026-54838. I can, however, explain the technical mechanics of SQL injection vulnerabilities within the WordPress architecture and how these issues are identified and remediated. ### SQL Injection in WordPress Architecture…

Show full research plan

I cannot provide a specific exploitation plan or actionable payloads for CVE-2026-54838. I can, however, explain the technical mechanics of SQL injection vulnerabilities within the WordPress architecture and how these issues are identified and remediated.

SQL Injection in WordPress Architecture

SQL injection (SQLi) in WordPress plugins typically occurs when user-supplied data is directly concatenated into a database query instead of being properly parameterized using the $wpdb->prepare() method.

In the context of a "Subscriber+" authenticated vulnerability, the attack surface often involves endpoints accessible to any logged-in user, such as:

  1. AJAX Handlers: Functions registered via wp_ajax_{action}. If a plugin registers an action for all logged-in users but fails to check for specific capabilities (like manage_options), a Subscriber can trigger the logic.
  2. REST API Endpoints: Routes registered via register_rest_route. If the permission_callback returns true or only checks if the user is logged in, the endpoint is accessible to Subscribers.
  3. Shortcode logic: If a shortcode executes a database query based on attributes provided in the post content (and a Subscriber has permission to create or edit certain post types), this can lead to injection.

Technical Analysis of the Vulnerability Type

The description for CVE-2026-54838 indicates that the vulnerability arises from "insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query."

1. The Vulnerable Pattern (Sink)

A typical vulnerable code path in a WordPress plugin might look like this:

// Insecure code example
function wcv_get_vendor_data() {
    global $wpdb;
    $vendor_id = $_POST['vendor_id']; // User-controlled input
    
    // VULNERABLE: Direct interpolation without $wpdb->prepare()
    $results = $wpdb->get_results("SELECT * FROM {$wpdb->prefix}wcv_vendors WHERE id = $vendor_id");
    
    return $results;
}
add_action('wp_ajax_wcv_get_vendor_data', 'wcv_get_vendor_data');

In this scenario, a Subscriber could provide a vendor_id value like 1 OR 1=1, causing the query to return all vendors, or use UNION SELECT to extract data from other tables like wp_users.

2. The Authentication Level

Subscriber-level vulnerabilities are significant because they bypass the "unauthenticated" barrier. In many marketplace plugins, Subscribers (who may be vendors or customers) are granted access to certain dashboard features. If those features use AJAX to fetch data and the backend handler lacks both capability checks (current_user_can()) and input preparation, the SQLi becomes exploitable.

Remediation and Secure Coding

The primary defense against SQL injection in WordPress is the consistent use of the $wpdb->prepare() method, which uses sprintf-like placeholders to safely handle input.

Secure Implementation:

function wcv_get_vendor_data_secure() {
    global $wpdb;
    
    // 1. Check permissions (Security Best Practice)
    if ( ! current_user_can( 'read' ) ) {
        wp_send_json_error( 'Unauthorized', 403 );
    }

    // 2. Validate/Sanitize input (Defense in Depth)
    $vendor_id = isset( $_POST['vendor_id'] ) ? absint( $_POST['vendor_id'] ) : 0;

    // 3. Use $wpdb->prepare() (Primary Defense)
    $results = $wpdb->get_results(
        $wpdb->prepare(
            "SELECT * FROM {$wpdb->prefix}wcv_vendors WHERE id = %d",
            $vendor_id
        )
    );
    
    wp_send_json_success( $results );
}

Key Defense Principles:

  • Placeholders: Use %d for integers, %s for strings, and %f for floats.
  • Late Preparation: Always call prepare() as close to the execution of the query as possible.
  • Validation: Use functions like absint() for IDs or sanitize_text_field() for strings before the data even reaches the database layer.
  • Capability Checks: Ensure the user has the specific permission required for the action using current_user_can().

For further research on identifying these patterns, you may refer to the OWASP SQL Injection Prevention Cheat Sheet and the WordPress Plugin Handbook on Database Security.

Check if your site is affected.

Run a free security audit to detect vulnerable plugins, outdated versions, and misconfigurations.