Simple Content Restriction Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/your-id-please

Ask your visitors to login if the post is marked as visible only to registered users.

10 active installs v0.1 PHP + WP 2.9+ Updated Jan 25, 2011
contentloginrequiredrestrictusers
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is Simple Content Restriction Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

Simple Content Restriction has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 15yr ago
Risk Assessment

The 'your-id-please' plugin version 0.1 exhibits a mixed security posture. On the positive side, the static analysis reveals a remarkably small attack surface with zero identified entry points such as AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, or cron events. Furthermore, the plugin demonstrates good practices by using prepared statements for all SQL queries, indicating a low risk of traditional SQL injection vulnerabilities. It also includes nonces and capability checks, which are crucial for securing operations.

However, a significant concern arises from the output escaping. With only 17% of outputs properly escaped, there is a high likelihood of cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. This means that user-supplied data, if not handled carefully by the limited escaped outputs, could be rendered in the browser in an unsafe manner, potentially allowing attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of a user's session. The lack of any taint analysis results could imply a very limited scope of analysis or, more optimistically, that no critical flows were detected within the analyzed code.

The plugin's vulnerability history is clean, with no recorded CVEs. This is a strong indicator of past security diligence or, possibly, a lack of past scrutiny due to its small attack surface or limited adoption. Despite the clean history, the identified output escaping weakness is a concrete risk that needs immediate attention. In conclusion, while 'your-id-please' v0.1 boasts a minimal attack surface and secure SQL practices, the prevalent lack of output escaping presents a substantial security risk, specifically for XSS, which significantly outweighs its current strengths.

Key Concerns

  • Insufficient output escaping
Vulnerabilities
None known

Simple Content Restriction Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

Simple Content Restriction Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
5
1 escaped
Nonce Checks
1
Capability Checks
2
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

17% escaped6 total outputs
Attack Surface

Simple Content Restriction Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 4
filterthe_contentplease-login.php:139
actionadmin_initplease-login.php:140
actionsave_postplease-login.php:141
actionadmin_initplease-login.php:142
Maintenance & Trust

Simple Content Restriction Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested3.0.5
Last updatedJan 25, 2011
PHP min version
Downloads3K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

Simple Content Restriction Developer Profile

S

8 plugins · 490 total installs

84
trust score
Avg Security Score
85/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect Simple Content Restriction

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
yidp_toggle
Data Attributes
name="your-id-please"id="yidp_enabled"name="yidp_enabled"id="yidp_message"name="yidp_message"id="your-id-please"
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Simple Content Restriction