WP_PingPreserver Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/wp-pingpreserver

Prevents WordPress from eating pings that come too quickly in succession (i.e. a single post linking to more than one of your pages).

10 active installs v0.4 PHP + WP 1.5+ Updated Jan 22, 2008
commentsfixhackpingtrackback
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is WP_PingPreserver Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

WP_PingPreserver has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 18yr ago
Risk Assessment

The wp-pingpreserver v0.4 plugin exhibits a mixed security posture. On the positive side, there are no registered CVEs, no bundled libraries, no file operations, no external HTTP requests, and all detected outputs are properly escaped. This suggests a good level of attention to common web application security pitfalls. However, the static analysis reveals significant concerns. The presence of a raw SQL query without prepared statements is a notable risk that could lead to SQL injection vulnerabilities if the query is not properly sanitized before execution. Furthermore, the taint analysis indicates two flows with unsanitized paths, classified as high severity. These flows represent potential avenues for attackers to inject malicious code or data into the application if the input is not rigorously validated and neutralized. The complete absence of nonce and capability checks on any entry points is also a critical oversight, leaving the plugin vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) and unauthorized privilege escalation attacks if any logic relies on user actions.

Key Concerns

  • High severity unsanitized taint flows
  • Raw SQL query without prepared statements
  • Missing capability checks on entry points
  • Missing nonce checks on entry points
Vulnerabilities
None known

WP_PingPreserver Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

WP_PingPreserver Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
1
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
0
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

SQL Query Safety

0% prepared1 total queries
Data Flows
2 unsanitized

Data Flow Analysis

2 flows2 with unsanitized paths
pingpreserver_comment_flood_fixer (wp_pingpreserver.php:15)
Source (user input) Sink (dangerous op) Sanitizer Transform Unsanitized Sanitized
Attack Surface

WP_PingPreserver Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 1
filtercomment_flood_filterwp_pingpreserver.php:12
Maintenance & Trust

WP_PingPreserver Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested2.3.1
Last updatedJan 22, 2008
PHP min version
Downloads2K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

WP_PingPreserver Developer Profile

scottsm

5 plugins · 60 total installs

84
trust score
Avg Security Score
85/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect WP_PingPreserver

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about WP_PingPreserver