TwitterGrid Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/twittergrid

Displays the Twitter-Images of all your friends as a mosaic in the sidebar of your blog. The plugin is widget ready and comes with many configuration …

10 active installs v0.3 PHP + WP 2.0.2+ Updated Oct 15, 2014
followertweetstwittwitter
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is TwitterGrid Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

TwitterGrid has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 11yr ago
Risk Assessment

The "twittergrid" v0.3 plugin presents a mixed security posture. On the positive side, the plugin demonstrates good practices by utilizing prepared statements for all SQL queries and has no known vulnerabilities (CVEs) recorded. The static analysis also indicates a lack of external HTTP requests and bundled libraries, which can reduce attack vectors. However, several concerning signals emerge from the code analysis. The presence of the deprecated `create_function` is a significant risk, as it can be exploited for remote code execution in certain contexts. Furthermore, the plugin exhibits poor output escaping practices, with only 24% of outputs properly escaped, leaving it susceptible to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. The absence of any nonce checks or capability checks on potential entry points, even though the attack surface is reported as zero, raises questions about how these entry points are handled and if they are truly secured against unauthorized access or manipulation. While the lack of historical vulnerabilities is a strength, the current code analysis reveals specific weaknesses that require attention. The plugin's strengths lie in its database query security and absence of known CVEs, but the significant output escaping issues and the use of a dangerous function warrant caution.

Key Concerns

  • Use of create_function
  • Low percentage of properly escaped output
  • No nonce checks detected
  • No capability checks detected
Vulnerabilities
None known

TwitterGrid Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

TwitterGrid Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
1
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
13
4 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
3
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Dangerous Functions Found

create_functionadd_action( 'plugins_loaded', create_function( '$TwitterGrid_5kqll', 'global $TwitterGrid; $TwitterGtwittergrid.php:328

Output Escaping

24% escaped17 total outputs
Attack Surface

TwitterGrid Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 5
filterwp_headtwittergrid.php:48
actionadmin_menutwittergrid.php:51
actionwidgets_inittwittergrid.php:54
filteradmin_footertwittergrid.php:197
actionplugins_loadedtwittergrid.php:328
Maintenance & Trust

TwitterGrid Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested4.0.38
Last updatedOct 15, 2014
PHP min version
Downloads4K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

TwitterGrid Developer Profile

tomknows

2 plugins · 20 total installs

89
trust score
Avg Security Score
93/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect TwitterGrid

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

Asset Paths
/wp-content/plugins/twittergrid/styles/twittergrid.css
Version Parameters
twittergrid/style.css?ver=

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

Data Attributes
name="twittergrid[title]"name="twittergrid[username]"name="twittergrid[limit]"name="twittergrid[width]"name="twittergrid[height]"name="twittergrid[link]"+3 more
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about TwitterGrid