Twitter Tag Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/twitter-tag

Link to a users Twitter page when you include a Twitter @username in a post and tweet the user that they have been tagged.

10 active installs v1.0 PHP + WP 2.5+ Updated Apr 13, 2009
linkstweettwitter
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is Twitter Tag Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

Twitter Tag has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 16yr ago
Risk Assessment

The "twitter-tag" v1.0 plugin exhibits a generally positive security posture with a very small attack surface and no known vulnerabilities in its history. The complete absence of direct SQL queries, relying instead on prepared statements, and the lack of file operations or bundled libraries are strong indicators of good development practices in these areas.

However, significant concerns arise from the output escaping. With 4 total outputs and 0% properly escaped, this presents a substantial risk of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. Any user-supplied data displayed on the frontend without proper sanitization can be exploited. Additionally, the presence of external HTTP requests without clearly defined sanitization or authorization checks for their parameters, coupled with a complete lack of nonce and capability checks for any potential entry points (even though the static analysis reports zero), indicates potential blind spots in security.

While the plugin's vulnerability history is clean, this is not a guarantee of future security, especially given the identified output escaping deficiencies. The strengths lie in its minimal attack surface and reliance on prepared statements. The primary weakness is the critical lack of output escaping, which could be exploited to inject malicious scripts. A balanced conclusion is that the plugin has a solid foundation in some areas, but critical flaws in output handling and potential unaddressed risks in external requests require immediate attention.

Key Concerns

  • 0% output escaping
  • External HTTP requests without auth/sanitization
  • 0 nonces checks for potential entry points
  • 0 capability checks for potential entry points
Vulnerabilities
None known

Twitter Tag Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

Twitter Tag Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
4
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
2
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

0% escaped4 total outputs
Attack Surface

Twitter Tag Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 4
actionadmin_menutwitter-tag.php:30
actionplugins_loadedtwitter-tag.php:189
filterthe_contenttwitter-tag.php:191
actionpublish_posttwitter-tag.php:193
Maintenance & Trust

Twitter Tag Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested2.7.1
Last updatedApr 13, 2009
PHP min version
Downloads2K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

Twitter Tag Developer Profile

paulmac

4 plugins · 80 total installs

86
trust score
Avg Security Score
89/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect Twitter Tag

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
wrap
Data Attributes
pmc_TT_userpmc_TT_passpmc_TT_tweet
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Twitter Tag