FT TextImage Nav Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/text-for-image-navigation

This plugin allows you to replace the default previous and next image links with a set of custom ones that print a text based link rather than a thumb …

10 active installs v1.2 PHP + WP 2.5+ Updated Nov 19, 2015
fullthrottlegalleryimageslinksnavigation
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is FT TextImage Nav Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

FT TextImage Nav has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 10yr ago
Risk Assessment

The text-for-image-navigation v1.2 plugin exhibits a generally good security posture based on the provided static analysis. There are no identified dangerous functions, SQL injection risks via prepared statements, file operations, external HTTP requests, or any recorded vulnerabilities in its history. This indicates a proactive approach to secure coding and maintenance. However, the analysis does reveal areas for improvement. The absence of nonce and capability checks across all entry points (though there are none in this specific version) is a significant concern. While the current attack surface is zero, this lack of fundamental security mechanisms could expose the plugin to vulnerabilities if new entry points are introduced in future updates without proper authorization checks. The presence of unescaped output, even in a limited capacity, also presents a potential risk for cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, especially if user-supplied data is involved in these outputs.

In conclusion, the plugin is currently in a strong security position due to its lack of known vulnerabilities and adherence to secure coding practices for SQL. The most pressing concerns revolve around the missing authorization checks (nonces and capabilities) on potential entry points and the unescaped output. These are foundational security elements that, if overlooked in future development, could lead to significant security weaknesses. The developer should prioritize implementing these checks to maintain a robust security profile.

Key Concerns

  • Missing nonce checks on potential entry points
  • Missing capability checks on potential entry points
  • Unescaped output detected
Vulnerabilities
None known

FT TextImage Nav Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

FT TextImage Nav Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
1
1 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

50% escaped2 total outputs
Attack Surface

FT TextImage Nav Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
Maintenance & Trust

FT TextImage Nav Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested4.4.34
Last updatedNov 19, 2015
PHP min version
Downloads3K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

FT TextImage Nav Developer Profile

Glenn Ansley

7 plugins · 670 total installs

84
trust score
Avg Security Score
85/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect FT TextImage Nav

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
ft_text_image_link
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about FT TextImage Nav