TeleCube Ringy Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/telecube-ringy

This plugin is used in conjunction with TeleCube's RINGY services, as described at: https://www.telecube.pl/callback-RINGY/ The goal of this plug …

10 active installs v1.0.1 PHP 5.3.27+ WP 4.9+ Updated Unknown
callbackphone-callringytelephonyvoip
100
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is TeleCube Ringy Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 100/100

TeleCube Ringy has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs
Risk Assessment

The telecube-ringy plugin version 1.0.1 exhibits a strong initial security posture based on static analysis, with no identified AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, or cron events that pose an attack surface. Furthermore, the code signals indicate a lack of dangerous functions and all SQL queries utilize prepared statements, which are excellent security practices. The absence of any recorded vulnerabilities in its history also suggests a relatively secure development track record.

However, a significant concern arises from the 0% output escaping. This means that any dynamic data rendered by the plugin is not being sanitized, creating a high risk of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. While taint analysis shows no unsanitized paths, this could be a limitation of the analysis rather than an absence of risk, especially when coupled with the complete lack of output escaping. The presence of file operations without explicit mention of sanitization also warrants attention, though the number is low.

In conclusion, while the plugin demonstrates good foundational security practices by limiting its attack surface and using prepared statements for SQL, the critical flaw of unescaped output presents a substantial risk. The vulnerability history is a positive indicator, but it does not mitigate the immediate threat posed by potential XSS. Developers should prioritize addressing the output escaping issue to improve the plugin's overall security.

Key Concerns

  • 0% output properly escaped
  • 0 nonce checks found
  • 0 capability checks found
Vulnerabilities
None known

TeleCube Ringy Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 16, 2026

TeleCube Ringy Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
6
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
3
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

0% escaped6 total outputs
Attack Surface

TeleCube Ringy Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 4
actionadmin_menuoptions.php:16
actionadmin_initoptions.php:24
actionplugins_loadedtc-ringy.php:27
actionget_footertc-ringy.php:36
Maintenance & Trust

TeleCube Ringy Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested4.9.29
Last updatedUnknown
PHP min version5.3.27
Downloads1K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

TeleCube Ringy Developer Profile

telecubeplugins

1 plugin · 10 total installs

94
trust score
Avg Security Score
100/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect TeleCube Ringy

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

Asset Paths
/wp-content/plugins/telecube-ringy/logo.svg/wp-content/plugins/telecube-ringy/footer.js
Script Paths
/wp-content/plugins/telecube-ringy/footer.js

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
wrapwp-core-ui
Data Attributes
id="tc-ringy-uuid"
JS Globals
var tcc_uuid = "
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about TeleCube Ringy