Stylish Box Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/stylish-box

Change the post, page (the content) CSS into the Colorful Box CSS Shadow

0 active installs v2.00 PHP + WP 4.6+ Updated Unknown
content-stylepage-stylepost-stylestylish-box
100
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is Stylish Box Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 100/100

Stylish Box has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs
Risk Assessment

The "stylish-box" plugin v2.00, based on the provided static analysis and vulnerability history, presents a generally strong security posture. The absence of known CVEs and a lack of identified vulnerabilities in its history are positive indicators. Furthermore, the code analysis reveals a very small attack surface with no exposed entry points like AJAX handlers, REST API routes, or shortcodes without authentication checks. The plugin also demonstrates good practices by not making external HTTP requests and properly handling SQL queries with prepared statements. Nonce and capability checks are present, which are crucial for securing interactions within WordPress.

However, a notable concern arises from the output escaping. With only 25% of its four identified output operations being properly escaped, there is a significant risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. This means that user-supplied or dynamic data displayed to users might not be sanitized, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts. While the taint analysis did not reveal any unsanitized flows in the limited scope of two analyzed flows, the weak output escaping is a glaring weakness that could easily be exploited if any user input is processed and displayed without adequate sanitization.

In conclusion, "stylish-box" v2.00 has strong foundational security practices, particularly regarding its limited attack surface and secure database interactions. The lack of past vulnerabilities is encouraging. The primary and most critical weakness lies in its insufficient output escaping, which represents a substantial XSS risk that needs immediate attention. Addressing this output sanitization issue should be the top priority to improve its overall security.

Key Concerns

  • Insufficient output escaping (25% proper)
Vulnerabilities
None known

Stylish Box Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

Stylish Box Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
3
1 escaped
Nonce Checks
1
Capability Checks
1
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

25% escaped4 total outputs
Data Flows
All sanitized

Data Flow Analysis

2 flows
stylish_box_setting_page (init.php:121)
Source (user input) Sink (dangerous op) Sanitizer Transform Unsanitized Sanitized
Attack Surface

Stylish Box Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 3
actionthe_contentinit.php:88
actionadmin_menuinit.php:103
actionadmin_enqueue_scriptsinit.php:119
Maintenance & Trust

Stylish Box Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested5.5.18
Last updatedUnknown
PHP min version
Downloads1K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs0
Developer Profile

Stylish Box Developer Profile

nath4n

5 plugins · 20 total installs

88
trust score
Avg Security Score
91/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect Stylish Box

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

Asset Paths
/wp-content/plugins/stylish-box/stylish-box-style.css/wp-content/plugins/stylish-box/style-admin.css

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
wrap-stylishboxshadow1shadow2shadow3shadow4shadow5shadow6+3 more
Data Attributes
id="shadow1"id="shadow2"id="shadow3"id="shadow4"id="shadow5"id="shadow6"+2 more
JS Globals
jQuery
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Stylish Box