
Stand With Ukraine Security & Risk Analysis
wordpress.org/plugins/stand-with-ukraineDisplays a banner and link on your site to show your support for Ukraine. Styles are output inline for performance reasons, but can be filtered using …
Is Stand With Ukraine Safe to Use in 2026?
Generally Safe
Score 85/100Stand With Ukraine has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.
The "stand-with-ukraine" plugin v1.0.5 exhibits a strong security posture based on the provided static analysis. The absence of any identified dangerous functions, SQL injection vulnerabilities (all queries are prepared), file operations, external HTTP requests, and a clean taint analysis report are all positive indicators. Furthermore, the plugin appears to have a minimal attack surface with no exposed AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, or cron events. The vulnerability history also shows no recorded CVEs, suggesting a well-maintained and secure development practice to date.
However, there are a couple of areas that warrant attention. The lack of nonce checks and capability checks across all entry points, while currently having zero entry points, indicates a potential weakness if the attack surface were to expand in future versions without corresponding security checks being implemented. Additionally, a significant portion of the output (25%) is not properly escaped, which could lead to cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities if user-supplied data is not handled carefully. While the current lack of vulnerabilities is commendable, the potential for XSS and the absence of authorization checks on potential future entry points are areas that require vigilance.
In conclusion, the "stand-with-ukraine" plugin is currently in a good security state, with no critical vulnerabilities identified. Its proactive approach to SQL security and minimal attack surface are strengths. The primary concerns lie in the potential for XSS due to unescaped output and the lack of explicit authorization checks, which, while not currently exploitable, represent risks that should be addressed to maintain a robust security profile.
Key Concerns
- 25% of output not properly escaped
- No nonce checks on entry points
- No capability checks on entry points
Stand With Ukraine Security Vulnerabilities
Stand With Ukraine Release Timeline
Stand With Ukraine Code Analysis
Output Escaping
Stand With Ukraine Attack Surface
WordPress Hooks 2
Maintenance & Trust
Stand With Ukraine Maintenance & Trust
Maintenance Signals
Community Trust
Stand With Ukraine Alternatives
Stand With Ukraine Developer Profile
2 plugins · 20 total installs
How We Detect Stand With Ukraine
Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.
Asset Fingerprints
/wp-content/plugins/stand-with-ukraine/stand_with_ukraine.js/wp-content/plugins/stand-with-ukraine/stand_with_ukraine.jsstand-with-ukraine/stand_with_ukraine.js?ver=HTML / DOM Fingerprints
swu_options<style>
#stand_with_ukraine_overlay {
border: 10px solid #0057B8;
padding: 5px;
text-align: center;
text-combine: #0057B8;
background-color: #FFD700;
}
#stand_with_ukraine_overlay a {
display: inline-block;
padding: 3px 6px;
color: #0057B8;
border: 2px transparent dashed;
text-decoration: underline;
}
#stand_with_ukraine_overlay a:hover,
#stand_with_ukraine_overlay a:focus {
border: 2px #0057B8 dashed;
text-decoration: underline;
}
</style>