SpamPot Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/spampot

Adds a honeypot form field on the registration and login pages to trap spammers.

10 active installs v0.34 PHP + WP 3.8+ Updated Jul 13, 2016
honey-pothoney-traphoneypotspamspam-trap
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is SpamPot Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

SpamPot has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 9yr ago
Risk Assessment

The spampot v0.34 plugin exhibits a strong security posture based on the provided static analysis. The absence of any identified attack surface entry points, including AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, and cron events, significantly minimizes the plugin's exposure to external attacks. Furthermore, the code signals are generally positive, with no dangerous functions or file operations detected, and all SQL queries utilizing prepared statements. This indicates good development practices in these areas.

However, there are a couple of notable concerns. The fact that 50% of the output is not properly escaped presents a potential cross-site scripting (XSS) risk, especially if any of the unescaped outputs handle user-provided data. Additionally, the complete lack of nonce checks and capability checks across all entry points (though the static analysis indicates zero entry points) is a significant weakness. If any functionality were to be added or exposed indirectly, this would leave it vulnerable to unauthorized actions and CSRF attacks.

The vulnerability history is exceptionally clean, with no known CVEs recorded for this plugin. This, combined with the static analysis findings, suggests a plugin that has either been historically very secure or has not been extensively targeted or analyzed. While the current state appears strong, the potential XSS risk and the lack of robust authentication/authorization mechanisms in its foundational design are points of concern that could be exploited if new entry points are introduced or existing code is implicitly exposed.

Key Concerns

  • Unescaped output detected
  • No nonce checks on entry points
  • No capability checks on entry points
Vulnerabilities
None known

SpamPot Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Version History

SpamPot Release Timeline

v0.34Current
v0.32
v0.31
v0.3
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

SpamPot Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
1
1 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

50% escaped2 total outputs
Attack Surface

SpamPot Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 5
actionlogin_form_registerspampot.php:19
actionlogin_form_loginspampot.php:20
actionlogin_headspampot.php:23
actionlogin_footerspampot.php:24
actionlogin_footerspampot.php:27
Maintenance & Trust

SpamPot Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested4.5.33
Last updatedJul 13, 2016
PHP min version
Downloads2K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

SpamPot Developer Profile

keith_wp

11 plugins · 290 total installs

86
trust score
Avg Security Score
88/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect SpamPot

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
class-*
Data Attributes
name="error-class-*"id="class-*"name="class-*"
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about SpamPot