rtWidgets Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/rtwidgets

This installs multiple custom widgets in one activation. All the custom widgets are translation ready.

10 active installs v1.2.2 PHP + WP 3.8+ Updated Nov 17, 2014
custom-widgetfeedsidebarsocial-connectwidget
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is rtWidgets Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

rtWidgets has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 11yr ago
Risk Assessment

The 'rtwidgets' v1.2.2 plugin exhibits a seemingly strong security posture based on the static analysis provided, with no identified entry points that are unprotected. The absence of dangerous functions, file operations, external HTTP requests, and the presence of 100% prepared statements for SQL queries are positive indicators. However, a significant concern arises from the output escaping. With 10 total outputs and 0% properly escaped, this presents a substantial risk of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. Any user-supplied data that is displayed on the front-end or admin area without proper sanitization or escaping is a prime target for XSS attacks, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or defacement.

The vulnerability history shows no recorded CVEs, which is a positive sign and suggests that past versions may have been secure or vulnerabilities were quickly addressed. However, the lack of past vulnerabilities does not guarantee current security, especially when significant weaknesses like unescaped output are present. The absence of taint analysis results with unsanitized paths is also positive, but this could be due to the limited scope of the analysis or the lack of complex data flows within the plugin that might trigger taint vulnerabilities.

In conclusion, while 'rtwidgets' v1.2.2 benefits from a lack of direct attack vectors and secure SQL practices, the critical failure in output escaping creates a significant security weakness. The absence of recorded vulnerabilities is encouraging but should not overshadow the identified XSS risk. A more comprehensive security review, including thorough testing for XSS, is highly recommended to ensure user data and the WordPress site remain protected.

Key Concerns

  • Unescaped output detected
Vulnerabilities
None known

rtWidgets Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 16, 2026

rtWidgets Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
10
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

0% escaped10 total outputs
Attack Surface

rtWidgets Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 6
actionadmin_menuadmin\rtwidgets-options.php:19
actionadmin_initadmin\rtwidgets-options.php:20
actionadmin_enqueue_scriptsadmin\rtwidgets-options.php:161
actioninitrtwidgets-main.php:100
actionwp_enqueue_scriptsrtwidgets-main.php:103
actionwidgets_initrtwidgets-main.php:126
Maintenance & Trust

rtWidgets Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested4.0.38
Last updatedNov 17, 2014
PHP min version
Downloads4K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

rtWidgets Developer Profile

rtCamp

19 plugins · 119K total installs

75
trust score
Avg Security Score
94/100
Avg Patch Time
883 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect rtWidgets

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

Asset Paths
/wp-content/plugins/rtwidgets/assets/icon-font/css/rtw-fontello.css/wp-content/plugins/rtwidgets/assets/rtwidgets-style.css
Version Parameters
rtwidgets-style.css?ver=rtw-icon-fontsrtw-plugin-css

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
rtwidgets-adminrtw-facebookrtw-twitter
Data Attributes
data-options
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about rtWidgets