Post Type Name Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/post-type-name

Display post type name as a block with styling options.

100 active installs v1.0.1 PHP 7.4+ WP 6.6+ Updated Unknown
cptcustom-post-typelable
100
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is Post Type Name Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 100/100

Post Type Name has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs
Risk Assessment

The "post-type-name" v1.0.1 plugin exhibits an excellent security posture based on the provided static analysis and vulnerability history. The absence of any identifiable attack surface through AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, or cron events is a significant strength, meaning there are no apparent direct entry points for attackers to exploit. Furthermore, the code signals indicate a robust approach to security, with no dangerous functions, all SQL queries using prepared statements, and a very high percentage of properly escaped output. The lack of file operations and external HTTP requests also minimizes potential attack vectors.

The plugin's clean vulnerability history, with zero recorded CVEs across all severity levels and no common vulnerability types, further reinforces its secure design. This suggests that the developers have followed best practices and have likely conducted thorough security testing. The 0 taint flows analyzed, with none exhibiting unsanitized paths, align with the low overall risk profile.

While the plugin demonstrates many strengths, the complete absence of nonce checks and capability checks is a notable weakness. Although there are no currently exposed entry points, if any were to be introduced in future versions or through interactions with other plugins, these missing checks could become critical vulnerabilities. The overall conclusion is that "post-type-name" v1.0.1 is a highly secure plugin due to its minimal attack surface and secure coding practices, but the omission of essential security checks like nonces and capability checks represents a potential area for improvement and future risk if not addressed.

Key Concerns

  • Missing Nonce Checks
  • Missing Capability Checks
Vulnerabilities
None known

Post Type Name Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 16, 2026

Post Type Name Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
1
7 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

88% escaped8 total outputs
Attack Surface

Post Type Name Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 1
actioninitpost-type-name.php:31
Maintenance & Trust

Post Type Name Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested6.7.5
Last updatedUnknown
PHP min version7.4
Downloads973

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs100
Developer Profile

Post Type Name Developer Profile

Drivingralle

2 plugins · 800 total installs

94
trust score
Avg Security Score
100/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect Post Type Name

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

Asset Paths
/wp-content/plugins/post-type-name/build/index.js/wp-content/plugins/post-type-name/build/style-index.css
Script Paths
/wp-content/plugins/post-type-name/build/index.js
Version Parameters
post-type-name/build/index.js?ver=post-type-name/build/style-index.css?ver=

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
wp-block-post-type-name__prefixpost-type-name
Data Attributes
data-block="post-type-name/post-type-name"
Shortcode Output
<p class="post-type-name wp-block-post-type-name<span class="wp-block-post-type-name__prefix">
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Post Type Name