Pingcrawl Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/pingcrawl

Pingcrawl adds a "Possibly related posts" capability by querying Google Blog Search for post tags and pinging the results.

10 active installs v3.1 PHP + WP 2.8+ Updated Oct 4, 2009
googlepingbackseotagstrackback
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is Pingcrawl Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

Pingcrawl has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 16yr ago
Risk Assessment

The pingcrawl plugin v3.1 exhibits a mixed security posture. On the positive side, there are no known vulnerabilities (CVEs) associated with this plugin, and its SQL queries are all properly prepared, indicating good database interaction practices. The absence of a significant attack surface in terms of AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, and cron events is also a strength, as it limits potential entry points for attackers. Furthermore, the taint analysis shows no identified flows with unsanitized data, which is a very positive sign.

However, several significant concerns emerge from the static analysis. The presence of the `create_function` function is a critical red flag, as it can be a source of arbitrary code execution vulnerabilities if not handled with extreme care and sanitization. The fact that 100% of output is not properly escaped is another major vulnerability. This means that any dynamic data displayed by the plugin is susceptible to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts into user browsers. The plugin also makes external HTTP requests, and without further analysis, the security of these requests and the target endpoints is unknown. The complete lack of nonce checks and capability checks on any identified entry points, combined with the fact that the attack surface is technically zero (meaning it's hard to assess these checks directly), suggests a potential oversight in securing any future or hidden entry points.

Given the absence of historical vulnerabilities and the clean taint analysis, the plugin doesn't have a pattern of past security failures. However, the identified code signals point to immediate and serious risks. The use of `create_function` and the widespread lack of output escaping are critical weaknesses that expose the plugin to severe attacks. While the limited attack surface is good, it does not mitigate the inherent dangers within the code itself. Therefore, while the plugin has some good practices, the immediate risks associated with unescaped output and the dangerous `create_function` necessitate urgent attention.

Key Concerns

  • 100% of output not properly escaped
  • Dangerous function: create_function used
  • No nonce checks
  • No capability checks
  • External HTTP requests without context
Vulnerabilities
None known

Pingcrawl Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

Pingcrawl Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
1
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
14
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
1
Bundled Libraries
0

Dangerous Functions Found

create_functionadd_action( 'plugins_loaded', create_function( '', 'global $pc; $pc = new Pingcrawl();' ) );pingcrawl.php:158

Output Escaping

0% escaped14 total outputs
Attack Surface

Pingcrawl Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 5
actionpublish_postpingcrawl.php:38
actionplugins_loadedpingcrawl.php:158
actionadmin_menupingcrawl.php:163
actionadmin_initpingcrawl.php:164
filterplugin_row_metapingcrawl.php:165
Maintenance & Trust

Pingcrawl Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested2.8.4
Last updatedOct 4, 2009
PHP min version
Downloads9K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

Pingcrawl Developer Profile

mikegogulski

3 plugins · 90 total installs

84
trust score
Avg Security Score
85/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect Pingcrawl

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

Asset Paths
/wp-content/plugins/pingcrawl/img/icon-paypal.gif/wp-content/plugins/pingcrawl/img/icon-amazon.gif/wp-content/plugins/pingcrawl/img/icon-revmoney.gif/wp-content/plugins/pingcrawl/img/icon-pecunix.gif/wp-content/plugins/pingcrawl/img/icon-moneybookers.gif/wp-content/plugins/pingcrawl/img/icon-nostate.gif/wp-content/plugins/pingcrawl/img/icon-wordpress.gif/wp-content/plugins/pingcrawl/img/icon-trac.gif

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
pc-paddedpc_giftPayPalpc_giftAmazonpc_giftRevmoneypc_giftPecunixpc_giftMoneybookerspc_pluginHomepc_pluginSupport+2 more
Shortcode Output
<h4>Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)</h4>
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Pingcrawl