Peter’s Literal Comments Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/peters-literal-comments

All comments on your blog will be displayed as typed, without any allowed formatting.

200 active installs v1.0.2 PHP + WP 2.5+ Updated Nov 19, 2015
comments
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is Peter’s Literal Comments Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

Peter’s Literal Comments has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 10yr ago
Risk Assessment

The static analysis of "peters-literal-comments" v1.0.2 reveals an exceptionally clean codebase from a security perspective. The absence of any detected AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, cron events, or file operations indicates a minimal attack surface. Furthermore, the code demonstrates strong security practices with 100% of SQL queries utilizing prepared statements and all outputs being properly escaped. The lack of dangerous functions and external HTTP requests further solidifies this positive security posture.

The plugin has no recorded vulnerability history, with zero known CVEs across all severity levels. This historical data suggests a consistent track record of secure development and maintenance. The absence of any identified taint flows, even at lower severities, reinforces the findings of the static analysis, indicating no readily exploitable paths for malicious data injection or manipulation.

In conclusion, "peters-literal-comments" v1.0.2 exhibits an excellent security profile based on the provided data. The minimal attack surface, adherence to secure coding practices like prepared statements and output escaping, and a clean vulnerability history all point to a highly secure plugin. There are no immediate security concerns or deductions to be made based on the provided static analysis and vulnerability history.

Vulnerabilities
None known

Peter’s Literal Comments Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 16, 2026

Peter’s Literal Comments Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
0
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0
Attack Surface

Peter’s Literal Comments Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 4
filterpreprocess_commentpeters_literal_comments.php:38
filtercomment_textpeters_literal_comments.php:39
filtercomment_text_rsspeters_literal_comments.php:40
filtercomment_excerptpeters_literal_comments.php:41
Maintenance & Trust

Peter’s Literal Comments Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested4.8.28
Last updatedNov 19, 2015
PHP min version
Downloads6K

Community Trust

Rating100/100
Number of ratings3
Active installs200
Developer Profile

Peter’s Literal Comments Developer Profile

Peter

5 plugins · 4K total installs

80
trust score
Avg Security Score
89/100
Avg Patch Time
35 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect Peter’s Literal Comments

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Peter’s Literal Comments