Pagepeeker Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/pagepeeker

Put website thumbnails on your site. Use this shortcode [pagepeeker size="t" url="google.com" alt="Google"]

10 active installs v1.1 PHP + WP 3.0.1+ Updated Feb 19, 2013
screenshotssnapshot
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is Pagepeeker Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

Pagepeeker has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 13yr ago
Risk Assessment

The "pagepeeker" plugin version 1.1 exhibits a strong security posture based on the provided static analysis. The absence of dangerous functions, SQL queries, file operations, and external HTTP requests significantly reduces potential attack vectors. Furthermore, all identified SQL queries utilize prepared statements, and all outputs are properly escaped, indicating good coding practices for preventing common web vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. The plugin also has no recorded vulnerabilities (CVEs), which is a positive indicator of its security over time. However, the analysis does highlight some areas for improvement. The plugin has one shortcode, which represents an entry point, and the static analysis indicates a lack of explicit capability checks for this shortcode. While there are no critical or high severity taint flows detected, and the overall attack surface is small, the absence of capability checks on entry points is a potential concern that could lead to unauthorized access or actions if the shortcode is not designed with robust internal checks or if it relies solely on WordPress's default user permissions.

In conclusion, "pagepeeker" v1.1 appears to be a secure plugin due to its clean code and lack of historical vulnerabilities. The developer has implemented crucial security measures like prepared statements and output escaping. The primary concern lies in the potential for privilege escalation or unauthorized use of the shortcode due to the apparent lack of explicit capability checks. While the immediate risk seems low given the limited attack surface and zero reported CVEs, a thorough review of the shortcode's implementation is recommended to ensure it correctly enforces user permissions.

Key Concerns

  • Missing capability checks on entry points
Vulnerabilities
None known

Pagepeeker Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

Pagepeeker Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
0
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0
Attack Surface

Pagepeeker Attack Surface

Entry Points1
Unprotected0

Shortcodes 1

[pagepeeker] pagepeeker.php:22
Maintenance & Trust

Pagepeeker Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested3.5.2
Last updatedFeb 19, 2013
PHP min version
Downloads2K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

Pagepeeker Developer Profile

Anup Debnath

1 plugin · 10 total installs

84
trust score
Avg Security Score
85/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect Pagepeeker

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Pagepeeker