McLovin Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/mclovin

Get the right ID for your products when syncing them from WooCommerce to Meta (Facebook and Instagram)

10 active installs v1.0.0 PHP 7.0+ WP 6.0.0+ Updated Feb 21, 2024
content_idsfacebookmetapixelwoocommerce
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is McLovin Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

McLovin has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 2yr ago
Risk Assessment

The "mclovin" v1.0.0 plugin exhibits a strong security posture based on the provided static analysis and vulnerability history. The absence of any identified CVEs and the clean taint analysis are particularly positive indicators. The code demonstrates good practices by using prepared statements for all SQL queries and implementing nonce and capability checks. The limited attack surface, with no identified AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, or cron events exposed without proper authentication, further contributes to its secure design.

However, there is a slight concern regarding output escaping, where 67% of outputs are properly escaped, leaving one instance potentially vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) if the unescaped output is user-controlled. While the vulnerability history is excellent, the lack of any recorded past vulnerabilities could also, in some contexts, suggest limited exposure or testing. Overall, the plugin appears to be well-secured, with the primary area for improvement being the complete and consistent sanitization of all output.

In conclusion, "mclovin" v1.0.0 is commendably secure, especially given its clean vulnerability history and robust handling of sensitive operations like SQL queries. The presence of a nonce and capability check is a strength. The only identified area requiring attention is the output escaping, which, while largely handled, has a single instance that needs to be addressed to eliminate potential XSS risks. The plugin's minimal attack surface is a significant security benefit.

Key Concerns

  • Unescaped output found
Vulnerabilities
None known

McLovin Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

McLovin Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
1
2 escaped
Nonce Checks
1
Capability Checks
1
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

67% escaped3 total outputs
Data Flows
All sanitized

Data Flow Analysis

1 flows
<update-options> (inc\update-options.php:0)
Source (user input) Sink (dangerous op) Sanitizer Transform Unsanitized Sanitized
Attack Surface

McLovin Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 2
actionadmin_menuinc\settings.php:34
filterwc_facebook_fb_retailer_idmclovin.php:25
Maintenance & Trust

McLovin Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested6.4.8
Last updatedFeb 21, 2024
PHP min version7.0
Downloads962

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

McLovin Developer Profile

Johan Jonk Stenström

10 plugins · 14K total installs

72
trust score
Avg Security Score
90/100
Avg Patch Time
202 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect McLovin

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about McLovin