LH SEO Meta Tags Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/lh-seo-meta-tags

Basic SEO meta tags, decisions not options

0 active installs v1.01 PHP + WP 2.8+ Updated Jan 14, 2019
descriptionmetanoindexseo
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is LH SEO Meta Tags Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

LH SEO Meta Tags has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 7yr ago
Risk Assessment

The "lh-seo-meta-tags" plugin, version 1.01, demonstrates a generally positive security posture based on the provided static analysis. The absence of identifiable AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, and cron events contributing to the attack surface is a significant strength. Furthermore, the code's adherence to using prepared statements for all SQL queries and the presence of a nonce check indicate good development practices in these critical areas. The plugin also shows no history of known vulnerabilities, which is a strong indicator of past security consciousness.

However, a notable concern arises from the output escaping. With only 20% of 15 total outputs being properly escaped, there is a significant risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. This means that user-supplied data, if not handled carefully, could be injected into the page's output and executed by a user's browser. The lack of capability checks on any entry points, while the entry points are currently zero, could become a risk if future updates introduce new functionalities that are not adequately secured against unauthorized access.

In conclusion, while the plugin avoids many common pitfalls like raw SQL queries and a large attack surface, the poor handling of output escaping presents a tangible and immediate risk. The absence of vulnerability history is reassuring, but it does not mitigate the identified code-level weaknesses. Addressing the output escaping issues should be the top priority to improve the plugin's overall security.

Key Concerns

  • Low percentage of properly escaped output
  • Lack of capability checks on entry points
Vulnerabilities
None known

LH SEO Meta Tags Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

LH SEO Meta Tags Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
12
3 escaped
Nonce Checks
1
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

20% escaped15 total outputs
Attack Surface

LH SEO Meta Tags Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 6
actionwp_headlh-seo-meta-tags.php:379
actioninitlh-seo-meta-tags.php:382
actionadd_meta_boxeslh-seo-meta-tags.php:385
actionsave_postlh-seo-meta-tags.php:388
actionadmin_initlh-seo-meta-tags.php:391
filterlh_sitemaps_general_argslh-seo-meta-tags.php:395
Maintenance & Trust

LH SEO Meta Tags Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested5.0.25
Last updatedJan 14, 2019
PHP min version
Downloads1K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs0
Developer Profile

LH SEO Meta Tags Developer Profile

shawfactor

77 plugins · 15K total installs

91
trust score
Avg Security Score
87/100
Avg Patch Time
7 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect LH SEO Meta Tags

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

Asset Paths
/wp-content/plugins/lh-seo-meta-tags/css/style.css
Version Parameters
lh-seo-meta-tags/style.css?ver=

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

HTML Comments
<!-- begin LH SEO meta output --><!-- end LH SEO meta output -->
Data Attributes
name="lh_html_meta_tags-noindex"id="lh_html_meta_tags-noindex"name="lh_html_meta_tags-post_object-desc"name="lh_html_meta_tags-metabox-nonce"name="lh_html_meta_tags-site_keywords"name="lh_html_meta_tags-google_meta_tag_id"
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about LH SEO Meta Tags