HyToLat Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/hytolat

Converts Armenian characters in post,page and term links to Latin characters.

100 active installs v0.1 PHP + WP 1.5+ Updated Aug 8, 2015
armenianslugstranslationstransliterationurl
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is HyToLat Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

HyToLat has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 10yr ago
Risk Assessment

The "hytolat" v0.1 plugin exhibits an exceptionally small attack surface, with no identified AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, or cron events. This lack of exposed entry points is a strong security positive. Furthermore, the code analysis reveals excellent practices in key areas: zero dangerous functions, 100% use of prepared statements for SQL queries, and 100% proper output escaping. The absence of file operations and external HTTP requests further minimizes potential vulnerabilities. The plugin also has no known vulnerability history, indicating a clean track record so far. While the taint analysis identified two flows with unsanitized paths, their severity was rated as critical and high (0), suggesting they may be false positives or have negligible impact within the plugin's limited scope. The primary concern stemming from the static analysis is the complete absence of nonce and capability checks. While this might be a consequence of the minimal attack surface, it leaves any potential future additions to the plugin vulnerable if proper authentication and authorization mechanisms are not implemented. Overall, "hytolat" v0.1 demonstrates a strong initial security posture due to its limited exposure and good coding practices, but the lack of explicit security checks is a notable weakness that warrants attention for future development.

Key Concerns

  • No nonce checks implemented
  • No capability checks implemented
  • Taint flows with unsanitized paths detected
Vulnerabilities
None known

HyToLat Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 16, 2026

HyToLat Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
0
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0
Data Flows
2 unsanitized

Data Flow Analysis

2 flows2 with unsanitized paths
htl_options_page (hytolat.php:39)
Source (user input) Sink (dangerous op) Sanitizer Transform Unsanitized Sanitized
Attack Surface

HyToLat Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 2
actionadmin_menuhytolat.php:75
filtersanitize_titlehytolat.php:76
Maintenance & Trust

HyToLat Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested4.2.39
Last updatedAug 8, 2015
PHP min version
Downloads3K

Community Trust

Rating100/100
Number of ratings2
Active installs100
Developer Profile

HyToLat Developer Profile

davpro

1 plugin · 100 total installs

84
trust score
Avg Security Score
85/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect HyToLat

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

Asset Paths
/wp-content/plugins/hytolat/style.css/wp-content/plugins/hytolat/js/script.js
Script Paths
/wp-content/plugins/hytolat/js/script.js
Version Parameters
hytolat/style.css?ver=hytolat/js/script.js?ver=

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about HyToLat