Hybrid Byline Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/hybrid-byline

Adds an interface to the Hybrid Settings page to change the byline settings.

10 active installs v0.2.1 PHP + WP 2.8+ Updated Jan 14, 2010
bylinehybridmeta
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is Hybrid Byline Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

Hybrid Byline has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 16yr ago
Risk Assessment

The hybrid-byline plugin version 0.2.1 exhibits a generally good security posture based on the provided static analysis. The absence of exposed AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, and cron events significantly limits the plugin's attack surface. Furthermore, the analysis indicates no dangerous functions, no raw SQL queries, and no file operations, which are all positive security indicators. The presence of nonce and capability checks, even though limited, suggests some awareness of security best practices.

However, the static analysis reveals a critical weakness in output escaping. With 29 total outputs and only 3% properly escaped, there is a high probability of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. This is a significant concern as it can allow attackers to inject malicious scripts into pages viewed by other users. The taint analysis showing no flows with unsanitized paths might be misleading if the limited output escaping allows for script injection that isn't explicitly tracked as a "flow" in this specific analysis.

The plugin's vulnerability history is clean, with no recorded CVEs. This is a positive sign, suggesting that the plugin has not historically been a source of security issues. However, the current version's significant output escaping deficiency is a new concern that needs to be addressed independently of past history. In conclusion, while the plugin benefits from a small attack surface and good practices in areas like SQL and function usage, the severely inadequate output escaping presents a substantial security risk that should be prioritized for remediation.

Key Concerns

  • Insufficient output escaping detected
Vulnerabilities
None known

Hybrid Byline Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 16, 2026

Hybrid Byline Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
28
1 escaped
Nonce Checks
1
Capability Checks
1
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

3% escaped29 total outputs
Attack Surface

Hybrid Byline Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 5
actionplugins_loadedhybrid-byline.php:34
actionadmin_menuhybrid-byline.php:47
actionhybrid_child_settingshybrid-byline.php:48
actionhybrid_update_settings_pagehybrid-byline.php:49
filterhybrid_bylinehybrid-byline.php:52
Maintenance & Trust

Hybrid Byline Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested2.9.2
Last updatedJan 14, 2010
PHP min version
Downloads3K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

Hybrid Byline Developer Profile

Patrick Daly

3 plugins · 970 total installs

84
trust score
Avg Security Score
85/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect Hybrid Byline

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
bylinebyline-sepbyline-sep-editseparatoredit
HTML Comments
Security! Very important!
Data Attributes
name="hbp_meta_box_nonce"id="byline_post_show_author"name="byline_post_show_author"id="byline_post_show_authorlink"name="byline_post_show_authorlink"id="byline_post_authorlink_nofollow"+11 more
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Hybrid Byline