html suffix Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/html-suffix

1) Go to WordPress dashboard

10 active installs v1.0.0 PHP + WP 3.0.1+ Updated Dec 28, 2017
html-suffixhtml-to-pageshtml-to-urladds-html-to-pageswordpress-suffix
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is html suffix Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

html suffix has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 8yr ago
Risk Assessment

Based on the provided static analysis, the 'html-suffix' plugin v1.0.0 exhibits an excellent security posture. There are no identified entry points into the plugin that are unprotected, meaning all potential interactions would likely require proper authentication and authorization. The code also demonstrates strong adherence to secure coding practices with no dangerous function calls, all SQL queries using prepared statements, and all output properly escaped. Furthermore, there are no file operations or external HTTP requests, minimizing common attack vectors.

The vulnerability history for this plugin is also clear, with zero known CVEs. This, combined with the lack of any identified vulnerabilities during static analysis, suggests a well-maintained and secure codebase. The absence of critical or high-severity taint flows further reinforces the idea that there are no apparent paths for malicious data to compromise the application.

In conclusion, the 'html-suffix' plugin v1.0.0 appears to be highly secure based on the data presented. The developers have implemented robust security measures and have a clean track record. The lack of any identified weaknesses in the static analysis or vulnerability history is a significant strength. The only potential area for improvement, though not a current risk, would be to ensure future versions continue this strong security focus.

Vulnerabilities
None known

html suffix Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 17, 2026

html suffix Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
0
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0
Attack Surface

html suffix Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 7
actioninithtml_suffix.php:29
filteruser_trailingslashithtml_suffix.php:38
actionplugins_loadedincludes\class-html_suffix.php:137
actionadmin_enqueue_scriptsincludes\class-html_suffix.php:152
actionadmin_enqueue_scriptsincludes\class-html_suffix.php:153
actionwp_enqueue_scriptsincludes\class-html_suffix.php:168
actionwp_enqueue_scriptsincludes\class-html_suffix.php:169
Maintenance & Trust

html suffix Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested3.4.2
Last updatedDec 28, 2017
PHP min version
Downloads1K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

html suffix Developer Profile

Nasirul Islam

1 plugin · 10 total installs

84
trust score
Avg Security Score
85/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect html suffix

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

Asset Paths
/wp-content/plugins/html-suffix/css/html_suffix-admin.css/wp-content/plugins/html-suffix/js/html_suffix-admin.js
Script Paths
/wp-content/plugins/html-suffix/js/html_suffix-admin.js
Version Parameters
html_suffix-admin.css?ver=html_suffix-admin.js?ver=

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about html suffix