Geo Mark Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/geo-mark

Parses geo information in your content and can expose it either in microformat or as geo rss

10 active installs v0.9.1 PHP + WP 2.8+ Updated Jul 23, 2012
geogeo-rssmicroformatsplacemakeryql
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is Geo Mark Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

Geo Mark has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 13yr ago
Risk Assessment

The "geo-mark" plugin v0.9.1 exhibits a seemingly strong security posture based on the provided static analysis. It reports zero AJAX handlers, REST API routes, shortcodes, or cron events as entry points, indicating a very limited attack surface. Furthermore, the absence of dangerous functions, file operations, and external HTTP requests is positive. The use of prepared statements for all SQL queries is also a significant strength. However, a critical concern arises from the fact that 100% of its output is not properly escaped. This means that any data displayed to users could potentially be manipulated, leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities if the data originates from an untrusted source. The presence of one nonce check and two capability checks is a good indicator of some security awareness, but the lack of unescaped output is a major oversight.

The plugin's vulnerability history is completely clean, with no known CVEs or past issues. This suggests a history of good security practices or a lack of scrutiny. However, given the identified output escaping issue, this clean history might be due to the plugin's limited exposure or the nature of the data it handles rather than inherent robust sanitization. In conclusion, while the "geo-mark" plugin benefits from a small attack surface and secure database practices, the complete lack of output escaping presents a significant and direct risk of XSS vulnerabilities. This weakness outweighs the otherwise positive indicators, requiring immediate attention.

Key Concerns

  • 100% of output not properly escaped
Vulnerabilities
None known

Geo Mark Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Version History

Geo Mark Release Timeline

v0.9.1Current
v0.9
v0.8
v0.7
v0.5
v0.4
v0.3
v0.1
Code Analysis
Analyzed Apr 16, 2026

Geo Mark Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
4
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
1
Capability Checks
2
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

0% escaped4 total outputs
Attack Surface

Geo Mark Attack Surface

Entry Points0
Unprotected0
WordPress Hooks 19
actionadmin_menugeo-mark.php:56
actionadmin_menugeo-mark.php:58
actionadmin_initgeo-mark.php:59
actionsave_postgeo-mark.php:62
actionedit_postgeo-mark.php:63
actionpublish_postgeo-mark.php:64
actionedit_page_formgeo-mark.php:65
actiondraft_to_publishgeo-mark.php:67
actionfuture_to_publishgeo-mark.php:68
actionatom_nsgeo-mark.php:71
actionatom_entrygeo-mark.php:72
actionrss2_nsgeo-mark.php:74
actionrss2_itemgeo-mark.php:75
actionrdf_nsgeo-mark.php:77
actionrdf_itemgeo-mark.php:78
actionrss_nsgeo-mark.php:80
actionrss_itemgeo-mark.php:81
actionin_admin_footergeo-mark.php:155
actioninitgeo-mark.php:394
Maintenance & Trust

Geo Mark Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested3.4.2
Last updatedJul 23, 2012
PHP min version
Downloads4K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

Geo Mark Developer Profile

Sudar Muthu

20 plugins · 21K total installs

83
trust score
Avg Security Score
84/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect Geo Mark

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Geo Mark