BillyBenSWF Security & Risk Analysis

wordpress.org/plugins/billybenswf

Simple shortcode for swf/flash embedding. Autodetect original size. Can set size, object id+class, flashvar, attributes and parameter.

10 active installs v1.1.0 PHP + WP 2.8.1+ Updated Sep 15, 2011
embedflashflashvarincludeswf
85
A · Safe
CVEs total0
Unpatched0
Last CVENever
Safety Verdict

Is BillyBenSWF Safe to Use in 2026?

Generally Safe

Score 85/100

BillyBenSWF has no known CVEs and is actively maintained. It's a solid choice for most WordPress installations.

No known CVEs Updated 14yr ago
Risk Assessment

The "billybenswf" plugin version 1.1.0 presents a mixed security posture. On the positive side, the plugin exhibits excellent practices regarding SQL queries, exclusively using prepared statements, and shows no history of reported vulnerabilities (CVEs). The attack surface is minimal, with only one shortcode identified, and crucially, there are no identified AJAX handlers or REST API routes without authentication checks, nor are there any file operations, external HTTP requests, or cron events that could pose immediate risks. However, a significant concern arises from the complete lack of output escaping for all 19 identified output points. This means that any data outputted by the plugin is vulnerable to being rendered as executable code, potentially leading to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. Furthermore, the absence of nonce checks and capability checks on the shortcode entry point leaves it open to potential abuse if the shortcode itself handles user-supplied data, even without direct AJAX or REST API vulnerabilities. The taint analysis shows no critical or high severity flows, which is positive, but this is in conjunction with zero total flows analyzed, suggesting the taint analysis might not be comprehensive or that the plugin's logic is very simple. Overall, while the plugin avoids common pitfalls like raw SQL and known vulnerabilities, the lack of output escaping is a critical weakness that significantly elevates the risk of XSS attacks. The absence of input validation checks (nonce, capabilities) on its sole entry point further compounds this risk.

Key Concerns

  • Output escaping is not implemented
  • No nonce checks on entry points
  • No capability checks on entry points
  • Taint analysis not comprehensive
Vulnerabilities
None known

BillyBenSWF Security Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities — this is a good sign.
Code Analysis
Analyzed Mar 16, 2026

BillyBenSWF Code Analysis

Dangerous Functions
0
Raw SQL Queries
0
0 prepared
Unescaped Output
19
0 escaped
Nonce Checks
0
Capability Checks
0
File Operations
0
External Requests
0
Bundled Libraries
0

Output Escaping

0% escaped19 total outputs
Attack Surface

BillyBenSWF Attack Surface

Entry Points1
Unprotected0

Shortcodes 1

[BB_SWF] BillyBenSWF.php:49
WordPress Hooks 4
actionwp_loadedBillyBenSWF.php:50
actionadmin_menuscript\BBSWF_option_class.php:8
actionadmin_initscript\BBSWF_option_class.php:9
actionadmin_headscript\BBSWF_option_class.php:10
Maintenance & Trust

BillyBenSWF Maintenance & Trust

Maintenance Signals

WordPress version tested3.1.4
Last updatedSep 15, 2011
PHP min version
Downloads6K

Community Trust

Rating0/100
Number of ratings0
Active installs10
Developer Profile

BillyBenSWF Developer Profile

Billyben

2 plugins · 20 total installs

84
trust score
Avg Security Score
85/100
Avg Patch Time
30 days
View full developer profile
Detection Fingerprints

How We Detect BillyBenSWF

Patterns used to identify this plugin on WordPress sites during automated security audits and web crawling.

Asset Fingerprints

Asset Paths
/wp-content/plugins/BillyBenSWF/script/bbswf_js.js/wp-content/plugins/BillyBenSWF/script/bbswf_style.css
Script Paths
BillyBenSWF/script/bbswf_js.js

HTML / DOM Fingerprints

CSS Classes
tinyMCETA
Data Attributes
name="bbswf_options[folder]"name="bbswf_options[minfp]"name="bbswf_options[defaultContent]"
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about BillyBenSWF